Towards complexity-sensitive book metrics for scholarly monographs in national databases for research output
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Towards complexity-sensitive book metrics for scholarly monographs in national databases for research output. / Sīle, Linda; Guns, Raf; Zuccala, Alesia A.; Engels, Tim C.E.
I: Journal of Documentation, Bind 77, Nr. 5, 2021, s. 1173-1195.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards complexity-sensitive book metrics for scholarly monographs in national databases for research output
AU - Sīle, Linda
AU - Guns, Raf
AU - Zuccala, Alesia A.
AU - Engels, Tim C.E.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: This study investigates an approach to book metrics for research evaluation that takes into account the complexity of scholarly monographs. This approach is based on work sets – unique scholarly works and their within-work related bibliographic entities – for scholarly monographs in national databases for research output. Design/methodology/approach: This study examines bibliographic records on scholarly monographs acquired from four European databases (VABB in Flanders, Belgium; CROSBI in Croatia; CRISTIN in Norway; COBISS in Slovenia). Following a data enrichment process using metadata from OCLC WorldCat and Amazon Goodreads, the authors identify work sets and the corresponding ISBNs. Next, on the basis of the number of ISBNs per work set and the presence in WorldCat, they design a typology of scholarly monographs: Globally visible single-expression works, Globally visible multi-expression works, Miscellaneous and Globally invisible works. Findings: The findings show that the concept “work set” and the proposed typology can aid the identification of influential scholarly monographs in the social sciences and humanities (i.e. the Globally visible multi-expression works). Practical implications: In light of the findings, the authors outline requirements for the bibliographic control of scholarly monographs in national databases for research output that facilitate the use of the approach proposed here. Originality/value: The authors use insights from library and information science (LIS) to construct complexity-sensitive book metrics. In doing so, the authors, on the one hand, propose a solution to a problem in research evaluation and, on the other hand, bring to attention the need for a dialogue between LIS and neighbouring communities that work with bibliographic data.
AB - Purpose: This study investigates an approach to book metrics for research evaluation that takes into account the complexity of scholarly monographs. This approach is based on work sets – unique scholarly works and their within-work related bibliographic entities – for scholarly monographs in national databases for research output. Design/methodology/approach: This study examines bibliographic records on scholarly monographs acquired from four European databases (VABB in Flanders, Belgium; CROSBI in Croatia; CRISTIN in Norway; COBISS in Slovenia). Following a data enrichment process using metadata from OCLC WorldCat and Amazon Goodreads, the authors identify work sets and the corresponding ISBNs. Next, on the basis of the number of ISBNs per work set and the presence in WorldCat, they design a typology of scholarly monographs: Globally visible single-expression works, Globally visible multi-expression works, Miscellaneous and Globally invisible works. Findings: The findings show that the concept “work set” and the proposed typology can aid the identification of influential scholarly monographs in the social sciences and humanities (i.e. the Globally visible multi-expression works). Practical implications: In light of the findings, the authors outline requirements for the bibliographic control of scholarly monographs in national databases for research output that facilitate the use of the approach proposed here. Originality/value: The authors use insights from library and information science (LIS) to construct complexity-sensitive book metrics. In doing so, the authors, on the one hand, propose a solution to a problem in research evaluation and, on the other hand, bring to attention the need for a dialogue between LIS and neighbouring communities that work with bibliographic data.
KW - Bibliometrics
KW - Books
KW - Europe
KW - FRBR
KW - National databases
KW - Research evaluation
KW - Research output
KW - Scholarly monographs
KW - Work sets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103957101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/JD-06-2020-0107
DO - 10.1108/JD-06-2020-0107
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85103957101
VL - 77
SP - 1173
EP - 1195
JO - Journal of Documentation
JF - Journal of Documentation
SN - 0022-0418
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 260590134