Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

Standard

Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate. / Kock, Christian Erik J.

2017. Paper præsenteret ved The Sixth “Rhetoric in Society” Conference of the Rhetoric Society of Europe, Norwich, Storbritannien.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

Harvard

Kock, CEJ 2017, 'Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate', Paper fremlagt ved The Sixth “Rhetoric in Society” Conference of the Rhetoric Society of Europe, Norwich, Storbritannien, 03/07/2017 - 05/07/2017.

APA

Kock, C. E. J. (2017). Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate. Paper præsenteret ved The Sixth “Rhetoric in Society” Conference of the Rhetoric Society of Europe, Norwich, Storbritannien.

Vancouver

Kock CEJ. Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate. 2017. Paper præsenteret ved The Sixth “Rhetoric in Society” Conference of the Rhetoric Society of Europe, Norwich, Storbritannien.

Author

Kock, Christian Erik J. / Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate. Paper præsenteret ved The Sixth “Rhetoric in Society” Conference of the Rhetoric Society of Europe, Norwich, Storbritannien.

Bibtex

@conference{59d118e42d0a4ee78f3c67e10fddf378,
title = "Young Voters{\textquoteright} Responses to Polemical Debate",
abstract = "I will present an authentic case: 24 young voters in a Danish “Folk high school” watching a televised, very polemical debate between the two contenders for the office of Prime Minister of Denmark shortly before the parliamentary election in 2015. I asked this group to note down all their evaluative responses to the debate and to the opponents{\textquoteright} debate behavior, for each note marking the exact time—so that I could then collate these notes with the specific utterances and behaviors that they were made in response to. From this material it is possible to extract an interesting picture of what this group of alert young voters like or dislike debaters to do in a mediated polemical debate to which they are spectators: what speech act types, rhetorical maneuvers, argument types, etc., make them—metaphorically speaking—either cheer or hiss? This picture, in turn, may be held against various normative conceptions of public democratic debate, including my own.",
author = "Kock, {Christian Erik J}",
year = "2017",
language = "Dansk",
note = "null ; Conference date: 03-07-2017 Through 05-07-2017",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Young Voters’ Responses to Polemical Debate

AU - Kock, Christian Erik J

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - I will present an authentic case: 24 young voters in a Danish “Folk high school” watching a televised, very polemical debate between the two contenders for the office of Prime Minister of Denmark shortly before the parliamentary election in 2015. I asked this group to note down all their evaluative responses to the debate and to the opponents’ debate behavior, for each note marking the exact time—so that I could then collate these notes with the specific utterances and behaviors that they were made in response to. From this material it is possible to extract an interesting picture of what this group of alert young voters like or dislike debaters to do in a mediated polemical debate to which they are spectators: what speech act types, rhetorical maneuvers, argument types, etc., make them—metaphorically speaking—either cheer or hiss? This picture, in turn, may be held against various normative conceptions of public democratic debate, including my own.

AB - I will present an authentic case: 24 young voters in a Danish “Folk high school” watching a televised, very polemical debate between the two contenders for the office of Prime Minister of Denmark shortly before the parliamentary election in 2015. I asked this group to note down all their evaluative responses to the debate and to the opponents’ debate behavior, for each note marking the exact time—so that I could then collate these notes with the specific utterances and behaviors that they were made in response to. From this material it is possible to extract an interesting picture of what this group of alert young voters like or dislike debaters to do in a mediated polemical debate to which they are spectators: what speech act types, rhetorical maneuvers, argument types, etc., make them—metaphorically speaking—either cheer or hiss? This picture, in turn, may be held against various normative conceptions of public democratic debate, including my own.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 3 July 2017 through 5 July 2017

ER -

ID: 186783912