Progress, But Slow Going: Public Argument in the Forging of Collective Norms

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

Rhetorical argumentation is a craft: collective, processual, and circulating, and it partakes in the evolution of public norms. Official apologies can illustrate how rhetorical modalities over time effect change in civic sensibilities and effect collective moral reflection and evolution. Rhetorical citizenship, understood as encompassing both critical production and reception of publicly circulating arguments, is a way of conceptualizing the interaction between the individual and the collective in the ongoing discursive formation of the community and the norms that inform it.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftArgumentation
Sider (fra-til)325-337
Antal sider18
ISSN0920-427X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 28 aug. 2020

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 227195536