Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Konferenceartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research. / Moring, Camilla Elisabeth; Lloyd, Annemaree.

I: Information Research, Bind 18, Nr. 3, 15.09.2013.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Konferenceartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Moring, CE & Lloyd, A 2013, 'Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research', Information Research, bind 18, nr. 3. <http://informationr.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC35.html>

APA

Moring, C. E., & Lloyd, A. (2013). Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research. Information Research, 18(3). http://informationr.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC35.html

Vancouver

Moring CE, Lloyd A. Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research. Information Research. 2013 sep. 15;18(3).

Author

Moring, Camilla Elisabeth ; Lloyd, Annemaree. / Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research. I: Information Research. 2013 ; Bind 18, Nr. 3.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{c34c02f3d582458696f168d5bc3072f3,
title = "Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research",
abstract = "Introduction: This paper considers practice theory and the analytical implications of using this theoretical approach in information literacy research. More precisely the aim of the paper is to discuss the translation of practice theoretical assumptions into strategies that frame the analytical focus and interest when researching workplace information literacy. Two practice theoretical perspectives are selected, one by Theodore Schatzki and one by Etienne Wenger, and their general commonalities and differences are analysed and discussed.Analysis: The two practice theories and their main ideas of what constitute practices, how practices frame social life and the central concepts used to explain this, are presented. Then the application of the theories within workplace information literacy research is briefly explored. Results and Conclusion: The two theoretical perspectives share some commonalities as they both emphasise practice as a constellation of activities and share an interest in the constitution and conditioning of such activities in social life. However, researchers must be aware that there also exist differences between the two theories that impact on the analytical focus by emphasising some aspects of practice in favour of others. ",
author = "Moring, {Camilla Elisabeth} and Annemaree Lloyd",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Information Research",
issn = "1368-1613",
publisher = "University of Sheffield Department of Information Studies",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Analytical implications of using practice theory in workplace information literacy research

AU - Moring, Camilla Elisabeth

AU - Lloyd, Annemaree

PY - 2013/9/15

Y1 - 2013/9/15

N2 - Introduction: This paper considers practice theory and the analytical implications of using this theoretical approach in information literacy research. More precisely the aim of the paper is to discuss the translation of practice theoretical assumptions into strategies that frame the analytical focus and interest when researching workplace information literacy. Two practice theoretical perspectives are selected, one by Theodore Schatzki and one by Etienne Wenger, and their general commonalities and differences are analysed and discussed.Analysis: The two practice theories and their main ideas of what constitute practices, how practices frame social life and the central concepts used to explain this, are presented. Then the application of the theories within workplace information literacy research is briefly explored. Results and Conclusion: The two theoretical perspectives share some commonalities as they both emphasise practice as a constellation of activities and share an interest in the constitution and conditioning of such activities in social life. However, researchers must be aware that there also exist differences between the two theories that impact on the analytical focus by emphasising some aspects of practice in favour of others.

AB - Introduction: This paper considers practice theory and the analytical implications of using this theoretical approach in information literacy research. More precisely the aim of the paper is to discuss the translation of practice theoretical assumptions into strategies that frame the analytical focus and interest when researching workplace information literacy. Two practice theoretical perspectives are selected, one by Theodore Schatzki and one by Etienne Wenger, and their general commonalities and differences are analysed and discussed.Analysis: The two practice theories and their main ideas of what constitute practices, how practices frame social life and the central concepts used to explain this, are presented. Then the application of the theories within workplace information literacy research is briefly explored. Results and Conclusion: The two theoretical perspectives share some commonalities as they both emphasise practice as a constellation of activities and share an interest in the constitution and conditioning of such activities in social life. However, researchers must be aware that there also exist differences between the two theories that impact on the analytical focus by emphasising some aspects of practice in favour of others.

M3 - Conference article

VL - 18

JO - Information Research

JF - Information Research

SN - 1368-1613

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 49890610