C. A. Meredith, A. N. Prior, and Possible Worlds.
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
C. A. Meredith, A. N. Prior, and Possible Worlds. / Hasle, Per Frederik Vilhelm; Rybaříková, Zuzana.
Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior. red. / Per Hasle; Patrick Blackburn; Peter Øhrstrøm. Bind I Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 2018. s. 41-62 (Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior, Bind I).Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - C. A. Meredith, A. N. Prior, and Possible Worlds.
AU - Hasle, Per Frederik Vilhelm
AU - Rybaříková, Zuzana
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Abstract: Arthur Prior and Carew Meredith cooperated on the formulation of several systems of logic. The cooperation was so close that on the basis of their joint work, they are both considered to be precursors of possible worlds semantics. However, their concept of possible worlds, their understanding of the relevant formal representations and indeed their general approach to modal logic considerably differed. These differences should be pointed out in order to more precisely appreciate the contribution of each of these authors. To neglect the differences could cause the misinterpretation of Meredith’s and Prior’s work. On the one hand, it might cause corruption of Meredith’s system of logic and lead to paradoxes, as Prior pointed out in ‘Modal Logic with Functorial Variables and a Contingent Constant’. On the other hand, considering Prior as a mere follower of Meredith could cause an underestimation of Prior’s originality and contribution to this field.
AB - Abstract: Arthur Prior and Carew Meredith cooperated on the formulation of several systems of logic. The cooperation was so close that on the basis of their joint work, they are both considered to be precursors of possible worlds semantics. However, their concept of possible worlds, their understanding of the relevant formal representations and indeed their general approach to modal logic considerably differed. These differences should be pointed out in order to more precisely appreciate the contribution of each of these authors. To neglect the differences could cause the misinterpretation of Meredith’s and Prior’s work. On the one hand, it might cause corruption of Meredith’s system of logic and lead to paradoxes, as Prior pointed out in ‘Modal Logic with Functorial Variables and a Contingent Constant’. On the other hand, considering Prior as a mere follower of Meredith could cause an underestimation of Prior’s originality and contribution to this field.
UR - http://aauforlag.dk/Shop/andre/antologier-og-monografier/logic-and-philosophy-of-time-themes-from-prio.aspx
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 978-87-7112-677-8
VL - I
T3 - Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior
SP - 41
EP - 62
BT - Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior
A2 - Hasle, Per
A2 - Blackburn, Patrick
A2 - Øhrstrøm, Peter
PB - Aalborg Universitetsforlag
ER -
ID: 209327698