Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling. / Nicolaisen, Jeppe; Frandsen, Tove Faber.

I: Journal of Informetrics, Bind 6, Nr. 2, 04.2012, s. 276-284.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nicolaisen, J & Frandsen, TF 2012, 'Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling', Journal of Informetrics, bind 6, nr. 2, s. 276-284.

APA

Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2012). Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 276-284.

Vancouver

Nicolaisen J, Frandsen TF. Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling. Journal of Informetrics. 2012 apr.;6(2):276-284.

Author

Nicolaisen, Jeppe ; Frandsen, Tove Faber. / Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling. I: Journal of Informetrics. 2012 ; Bind 6, Nr. 2. s. 276-284.

Bibtex

@article{77f76dc432f147dba6b5d9d72da412db,
title = "Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling",
abstract = "The level of consensus in science has traditionally been measured by a number of different methods. The variety is important as each method measures different aspects of science and consensus. Citation analytical studies have previously measured the level of consensus using the scientific journal as their unit of analysis. To produce a more fine grained citation analysis one needs to study consensusformation on an even more detailed level – i.e. the scientific document or article. To do so, we have developed a new technique that measures consensus by aggregatedbibliographiccouplings (ABC) between documents. The advantages of the ABC-technique are demonstrated in a study of two selected disciplines in which the levels of consensus are measured using the propopsed technique.",
author = "Jeppe Nicolaisen and Frandsen, {Tove Faber}",
year = "2012",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "276--284",
journal = "Journal of Informetrics",
issn = "1751-1577",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus formation in science modeled by aggregated bibliographic coupling

AU - Nicolaisen, Jeppe

AU - Frandsen, Tove Faber

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - The level of consensus in science has traditionally been measured by a number of different methods. The variety is important as each method measures different aspects of science and consensus. Citation analytical studies have previously measured the level of consensus using the scientific journal as their unit of analysis. To produce a more fine grained citation analysis one needs to study consensusformation on an even more detailed level – i.e. the scientific document or article. To do so, we have developed a new technique that measures consensus by aggregatedbibliographiccouplings (ABC) between documents. The advantages of the ABC-technique are demonstrated in a study of two selected disciplines in which the levels of consensus are measured using the propopsed technique.

AB - The level of consensus in science has traditionally been measured by a number of different methods. The variety is important as each method measures different aspects of science and consensus. Citation analytical studies have previously measured the level of consensus using the scientific journal as their unit of analysis. To produce a more fine grained citation analysis one needs to study consensusformation on an even more detailed level – i.e. the scientific document or article. To do so, we have developed a new technique that measures consensus by aggregatedbibliographiccouplings (ABC) between documents. The advantages of the ABC-technique are demonstrated in a study of two selected disciplines in which the levels of consensus are measured using the propopsed technique.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 276

EP - 284

JO - Journal of Informetrics

JF - Journal of Informetrics

SN - 1751-1577

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 47052103