Consider the details: A Study of the Reading Distance and Revision Time of Electronic over Dry-Erase Whiteboards
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning
Standard
Consider the details : A Study of the Reading Distance and Revision Time of Electronic over Dry-Erase Whiteboards. / Rasmussen, Rasmus; Hertzum, Morten.
Proceedings of the 12th Danish HCI Research Symposium. red. / Stephan Wensveen. 2013.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Consider the details
T2 - A Study of the Reading Distance and Revision Time of Electronic over Dry-Erase Whiteboards
AU - Rasmussen, Rasmus
AU - Hertzum, Morten
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Electronic whiteboards are replacing dry-erase whiteboards in many contexts. In this study we compare electronic and dry-erase whiteboards in emergency departments (EDs) with respect to reading distance and revision time. We find inferior reading accuracy for the electronic whiteboard at all three levels of distance in our study. For revision time, the electronic whiteboard is slower on one subtask but there is no difference on another subtask. Participants prefer the electronic whiteboard. Given the font size of the electronic whiteboard, the inferior reading accuracy is unsurprising but the reduced possibilities for acquiring information at a glance when clinicians pass the whiteboard may adversely affect their overview. Conversely, the similar revision times for one subtask show that logon may be done quickly. We discuss how details such as font size and logon may impact the high-level benefits of electronic ED whiteboards
AB - Electronic whiteboards are replacing dry-erase whiteboards in many contexts. In this study we compare electronic and dry-erase whiteboards in emergency departments (EDs) with respect to reading distance and revision time. We find inferior reading accuracy for the electronic whiteboard at all three levels of distance in our study. For revision time, the electronic whiteboard is slower on one subtask but there is no difference on another subtask. Participants prefer the electronic whiteboard. Given the font size of the electronic whiteboard, the inferior reading accuracy is unsurprising but the reduced possibilities for acquiring information at a glance when clinicians pass the whiteboard may adversely affect their overview. Conversely, the similar revision times for one subtask show that logon may be done quickly. We discuss how details such as font size and logon may impact the high-level benefits of electronic ED whiteboards
M3 - Article in proceedings
BT - Proceedings of the 12th Danish HCI Research Symposium
A2 - Wensveen, Stephan
ER -
ID: 111308892