I, You, and We: Beyond Individualism and Collectivism

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

I, You, and We : Beyond Individualism and Collectivism. / Zahavi, Dan.

I: Australasian Philosophical Review, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Zahavi, D 2023, 'I, You, and We: Beyond Individualism and Collectivism', Australasian Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2024.2302443

APA

Zahavi, D. (2023). I, You, and We: Beyond Individualism and Collectivism. Australasian Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2024.2302443

Vancouver

Zahavi D. I, You, and We: Beyond Individualism and Collectivism. Australasian Philosophical Review. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2024.2302443

Author

Zahavi, Dan. / I, You, and We : Beyond Individualism and Collectivism. I: Australasian Philosophical Review. 2023.

Bibtex

@article{cfa4f7577fd74e75b63f7a6c20440180,
title = "I, You, and We: Beyond Individualism and Collectivism",
abstract = "The contemporary debate on collective intentionality in analytic philosophy has lasted several decades, but questions concerning the nature of {\textquoteleft}we{\textquoteright} and the relation between the individual and the community are obviously far older. We can find a particularly rich discussion in early phenomenology. Indeed, while starting out with an interest in the individual mind, phenomenologists began their exploration of dyadic forms of interpersonal relations shortly before the start of World War I and were already deeply engaged in extensive analyses of collective forms of intentionality a few years later. A distinctive feature of the phenomenological contribution was its exploration of the relation between the first- and second-person singular and the first-person plural perspectives. How are I, you, and we intertwined? The aim of this paper is to present some core insights from this early debate.",
author = "Dan Zahavi",
note = "Invited target paper with Open Peer Commentaries",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1080/24740500.2024.2302443",
language = "English",
journal = "Australasian Philosophical Review",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - I, You, and We

T2 - Beyond Individualism and Collectivism

AU - Zahavi, Dan

N1 - Invited target paper with Open Peer Commentaries

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The contemporary debate on collective intentionality in analytic philosophy has lasted several decades, but questions concerning the nature of ‘we’ and the relation between the individual and the community are obviously far older. We can find a particularly rich discussion in early phenomenology. Indeed, while starting out with an interest in the individual mind, phenomenologists began their exploration of dyadic forms of interpersonal relations shortly before the start of World War I and were already deeply engaged in extensive analyses of collective forms of intentionality a few years later. A distinctive feature of the phenomenological contribution was its exploration of the relation between the first- and second-person singular and the first-person plural perspectives. How are I, you, and we intertwined? The aim of this paper is to present some core insights from this early debate.

AB - The contemporary debate on collective intentionality in analytic philosophy has lasted several decades, but questions concerning the nature of ‘we’ and the relation between the individual and the community are obviously far older. We can find a particularly rich discussion in early phenomenology. Indeed, while starting out with an interest in the individual mind, phenomenologists began their exploration of dyadic forms of interpersonal relations shortly before the start of World War I and were already deeply engaged in extensive analyses of collective forms of intentionality a few years later. A distinctive feature of the phenomenological contribution was its exploration of the relation between the first- and second-person singular and the first-person plural perspectives. How are I, you, and we intertwined? The aim of this paper is to present some core insights from this early debate.

U2 - 10.1080/24740500.2024.2302443

DO - 10.1080/24740500.2024.2302443

M3 - Journal article

JO - Australasian Philosophical Review

JF - Australasian Philosophical Review

ER -

ID: 317205449