Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno: Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno : Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'. / Catana, Leo.

I: Journal of the History of Ideas, Bind 71, Nr. 1, 2010, s. 91-112.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Catana, L 2010, 'Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno: Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'', Journal of the History of Ideas, bind 71, nr. 1, s. 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.0.0068

APA

Catana, L. (2010). Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno: Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'. Journal of the History of Ideas, 71(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.0.0068

Vancouver

Catana L. Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno: Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'. Journal of the History of Ideas. 2010;71(1):91-112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.0.0068

Author

Catana, Leo. / Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno : Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'. I: Journal of the History of Ideas. 2010 ; Bind 71, Nr. 1. s. 91-112.

Bibtex

@article{8d551550ea1111ddbf70000ea68e967b,
title = "Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy{\textquoteright}s readings of Bruno: Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'",
abstract = "Lovejoy made rather grand methodological statements about the nature of history of ideas in his Great chain of being (1936). These statemens were, it is argued, rhetorical declarations, intended to produce the conviction in the minds of his readers that history of ideas was distinct from history of philosophy and thus deserved institutional independence; they were not adequate descriptions of the method actually practiced. Instead, Lovejoy{\textquoteright}s historiographical practice can be contextualized within nineteenth-century general histories of philosophy. His studies on Giordano Bruno, dating from 1904 and 1936 respectively, illustrate this historiographical continuity.",
author = "Leo Catana",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1353/jhi.0.0068",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "91--112",
journal = "Journal of the History of Ideas",
issn = "0022-5037",
publisher = "University of Pennsylvania Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leo Catana, 'Lovejoy’s readings of Bruno

T2 - Or how nineteenth-century history of philosophy was “transformed” into the history of ideas'

AU - Catana, Leo

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Lovejoy made rather grand methodological statements about the nature of history of ideas in his Great chain of being (1936). These statemens were, it is argued, rhetorical declarations, intended to produce the conviction in the minds of his readers that history of ideas was distinct from history of philosophy and thus deserved institutional independence; they were not adequate descriptions of the method actually practiced. Instead, Lovejoy’s historiographical practice can be contextualized within nineteenth-century general histories of philosophy. His studies on Giordano Bruno, dating from 1904 and 1936 respectively, illustrate this historiographical continuity.

AB - Lovejoy made rather grand methodological statements about the nature of history of ideas in his Great chain of being (1936). These statemens were, it is argued, rhetorical declarations, intended to produce the conviction in the minds of his readers that history of ideas was distinct from history of philosophy and thus deserved institutional independence; they were not adequate descriptions of the method actually practiced. Instead, Lovejoy’s historiographical practice can be contextualized within nineteenth-century general histories of philosophy. His studies on Giordano Bruno, dating from 1904 and 1936 respectively, illustrate this historiographical continuity.

U2 - 10.1353/jhi.0.0068

DO - 10.1353/jhi.0.0068

M3 - Journal article

VL - 71

SP - 91

EP - 112

JO - Journal of the History of Ideas

JF - Journal of the History of Ideas

SN - 0022-5037

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 9914913