Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'. / Catana, Leo.

I: Intellectual History Review, Bind 21, Nr. 4, 2011, s. 493-509.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Catana, L 2011, 'Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'', Intellectual History Review, bind 21, nr. 4, s. 493-509.

APA

Catana, L. (2011). Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'. Intellectual History Review, 21(4), 493-509.

Vancouver

Catana L. Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'. Intellectual History Review. 2011;21(4):493-509.

Author

Catana, Leo. / Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'. I: Intellectual History Review. 2011 ; Bind 21, Nr. 4. s. 493-509.

Bibtex

@article{acd1a17eb56841a9aa09a2585cd1d80d,
title = "Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'",
abstract = "Pioneering historians of science from the 19th century accounted for past, natural philosophy. Since the 18th century, historians of philosophy had covered this field as part of a wider narrative of past philosophy. Some early historians of science contrasted the methodologies governing the two historical disciplines, creating the impression that they were mutually independent. Modern commentators have tended to take these declarations at face value. This article argues that Tannery and Duhem, some of the first historians of science, transferred historiographical concepts from history of philosophy to history of science; their uses of the concept system of philosophy is one case in point",
author = "Leo Catana",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "493--509",
journal = "Intellectual History Review",
issn = "1749-6977",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leo Catana, 'Tannery and Duhem on the concept of a system in the history of philosophy and history of science'

AU - Catana, Leo

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Pioneering historians of science from the 19th century accounted for past, natural philosophy. Since the 18th century, historians of philosophy had covered this field as part of a wider narrative of past philosophy. Some early historians of science contrasted the methodologies governing the two historical disciplines, creating the impression that they were mutually independent. Modern commentators have tended to take these declarations at face value. This article argues that Tannery and Duhem, some of the first historians of science, transferred historiographical concepts from history of philosophy to history of science; their uses of the concept system of philosophy is one case in point

AB - Pioneering historians of science from the 19th century accounted for past, natural philosophy. Since the 18th century, historians of philosophy had covered this field as part of a wider narrative of past philosophy. Some early historians of science contrasted the methodologies governing the two historical disciplines, creating the impression that they were mutually independent. Modern commentators have tended to take these declarations at face value. This article argues that Tannery and Duhem, some of the first historians of science, transferred historiographical concepts from history of philosophy to history of science; their uses of the concept system of philosophy is one case in point

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 493

EP - 509

JO - Intellectual History Review

JF - Intellectual History Review

SN - 1749-6977

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 33260808