Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Mapping review networks : Exploring research community roles and contributions. / Zuccala, Alesia; Van Den Besselaar, Peter.

2007. 803-813 Paper præsenteret ved 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007, Madrid, Spanien.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Zuccala, A & Van Den Besselaar, P 2007, 'Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions', Paper fremlagt ved 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007, Madrid, Spanien, 25/06/2007 - 27/06/2007 s. 803-813.

APA

Zuccala, A., & Van Den Besselaar, P. (2007). Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions. 803-813. Paper præsenteret ved 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007, Madrid, Spanien.

Vancouver

Zuccala A, Van Den Besselaar P. Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions. 2007. Paper præsenteret ved 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007, Madrid, Spanien.

Author

Zuccala, Alesia ; Van Den Besselaar, Peter. / Mapping review networks : Exploring research community roles and contributions. Paper præsenteret ved 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007, Madrid, Spanien.11 s.

Bibtex

@conference{f45b663c90814b92bf03aa09d5c3e7e7,
title = "Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions",
abstract = "In this paper we investigate the position of a review network within a research specialty; the network of scholars who write reviews of their colleagues' work. This is one of the voluntary activities that researchers perform as a prerequisite for the functioning of the invisible college. We compare this network to other networks within the specialty, and this allows us to distinguish various roles: stars, influentials, members, supporters and juniors. As scholars are characterized by different role-configurations, the invisible college becomes stratified. We discuss the implications for the development of a referee factor and review factor, norms for refereeing and reviewing, and the development of systems-based research evaluations.",
keywords = "Invisible colleges, Mapping knowledge domains, Peer review, Subject specialties",
author = "Alesia Zuccala and {Van Den Besselaar}, Peter",
year = "2007",
month = jan,
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "803--813",
note = "11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007 ; Conference date: 25-06-2007 Through 27-06-2007",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Mapping review networks

T2 - 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007

AU - Zuccala, Alesia

AU - Van Den Besselaar, Peter

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - In this paper we investigate the position of a review network within a research specialty; the network of scholars who write reviews of their colleagues' work. This is one of the voluntary activities that researchers perform as a prerequisite for the functioning of the invisible college. We compare this network to other networks within the specialty, and this allows us to distinguish various roles: stars, influentials, members, supporters and juniors. As scholars are characterized by different role-configurations, the invisible college becomes stratified. We discuss the implications for the development of a referee factor and review factor, norms for refereeing and reviewing, and the development of systems-based research evaluations.

AB - In this paper we investigate the position of a review network within a research specialty; the network of scholars who write reviews of their colleagues' work. This is one of the voluntary activities that researchers perform as a prerequisite for the functioning of the invisible college. We compare this network to other networks within the specialty, and this allows us to distinguish various roles: stars, influentials, members, supporters and juniors. As scholars are characterized by different role-configurations, the invisible college becomes stratified. We discuss the implications for the development of a referee factor and review factor, norms for refereeing and reviewing, and the development of systems-based research evaluations.

KW - Invisible colleges

KW - Mapping knowledge domains

KW - Peer review

KW - Subject specialties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902161124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:84902161124

SP - 803

EP - 813

Y2 - 25 June 2007 through 27 June 2007

ER -

ID: 204186828