Observation, Interaction, Communication: The Role of the Second Person

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Standard

Observation, Interaction, Communication : The Role of the Second Person. / Zahavi, Dan.

I: Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Bind 97, Nr. 1, 2023, s. 82-103.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Harvard

Zahavi, D 2023, 'Observation, Interaction, Communication: The Role of the Second Person', Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, bind 97, nr. 1, s. 82-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akad001

APA

Zahavi, D. (2023). Observation, Interaction, Communication: The Role of the Second Person. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 97(1), 82-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akad001

Vancouver

Zahavi D. Observation, Interaction, Communication: The Role of the Second Person. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2023;97(1):82-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akad001

Author

Zahavi, Dan. / Observation, Interaction, Communication : The Role of the Second Person. I: Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2023 ; Bind 97, Nr. 1. s. 82-103.

Bibtex

@article{9b282007a4834816a367c48e55c7a34d,
title = "Observation, Interaction, Communication: The Role of the Second Person",
abstract = "Recent years have seen an upsurge of interest in the second-person perspective, not only in philosophy of mind, language, law and ethics, but also in various empirical disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology. A distinctive and perhaps also slightly puzzling feature of this ongoing discussion is that whereas many contributors insist that a proper consideration of the second-person perspective will have an impact on our understanding of social cognition, joint action, communication, self-consciousness, morality, and so on, there remains considerable disagreement about what exactly a second-person perspective amounts to (see Eilan 2014; Conant and R{\"o}dl 2014). What is the difference between adopting a second-person and a third-person perspective on another? How does one relate to another as a you and how does that differ from relating to another as a he, she or they? In the following, I will consider three different proposals and argue that a promising but somewhat overlooked account can be found in the work of Husserl.",
author = "Dan Zahavi",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/arisup/akad001",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "82--103",
journal = "Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observation, Interaction, Communication

T2 - The Role of the Second Person

AU - Zahavi, Dan

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Recent years have seen an upsurge of interest in the second-person perspective, not only in philosophy of mind, language, law and ethics, but also in various empirical disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology. A distinctive and perhaps also slightly puzzling feature of this ongoing discussion is that whereas many contributors insist that a proper consideration of the second-person perspective will have an impact on our understanding of social cognition, joint action, communication, self-consciousness, morality, and so on, there remains considerable disagreement about what exactly a second-person perspective amounts to (see Eilan 2014; Conant and Rödl 2014). What is the difference between adopting a second-person and a third-person perspective on another? How does one relate to another as a you and how does that differ from relating to another as a he, she or they? In the following, I will consider three different proposals and argue that a promising but somewhat overlooked account can be found in the work of Husserl.

AB - Recent years have seen an upsurge of interest in the second-person perspective, not only in philosophy of mind, language, law and ethics, but also in various empirical disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology. A distinctive and perhaps also slightly puzzling feature of this ongoing discussion is that whereas many contributors insist that a proper consideration of the second-person perspective will have an impact on our understanding of social cognition, joint action, communication, self-consciousness, morality, and so on, there remains considerable disagreement about what exactly a second-person perspective amounts to (see Eilan 2014; Conant and Rödl 2014). What is the difference between adopting a second-person and a third-person perspective on another? How does one relate to another as a you and how does that differ from relating to another as a he, she or they? In the following, I will consider three different proposals and argue that a promising but somewhat overlooked account can be found in the work of Husserl.

U2 - 10.1093/arisup/akad001

DO - 10.1093/arisup/akad001

M3 - Journal article

VL - 97

SP - 82

EP - 103

JO - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume

JF - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 355720398