Scholastic Humor: Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Scholastic Humor : Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice. / Schuman, Boaz Faraday.

I: History of Philosophy Quarterly, Bind 39, Nr. 2, 2022, s. 113-129.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schuman, BF 2022, 'Scholastic Humor: Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice', History of Philosophy Quarterly, bind 39, nr. 2, s. 113-129. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.39.2.02

APA

Schuman, B. F. (2022). Scholastic Humor: Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 39(2), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.39.2.02

Vancouver

Schuman BF. Scholastic Humor: Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice. History of Philosophy Quarterly. 2022;39(2):113-129. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.39.2.02

Author

Schuman, Boaz Faraday. / Scholastic Humor : Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice. I: History of Philosophy Quarterly. 2022 ; Bind 39, Nr. 2. s. 113-129.

Bibtex

@article{9e8023bd97464f0f945acb71f350cbc5,
title = "Scholastic Humor: Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice",
abstract = "Scholastic philosophers can be quite funny. What{\textquoteright}s more, they have good reason to be: Aristotle himself lists ready wit (eutrapelia) among the virtues, as a mean between excessive humor and its defect. Here, I assess Scholastic discussions of humor in theory, before turning to examples of it in practice. The last and finest of these is a joke, hitherto unacknowledged, which Aquinas makes in his famous Five Ways. Along the way, we{\textquoteright}ll see (i) that the history of philosophy is not so hostile to humor as is commonly supposed; and (ii) that the competing theories of humor like the Incongruity Theory and the Release Theory are not altogether incompatible. We{\textquoteright}ll also see (iii) at least one example of an apparent attempt by modern translators to excise humor from a medieval text. These considerations open a window into what oral discussion and debate at medieval universities was actually like, and how we should understand the relationship between the texts we have now and the exchanges that actually occurred then.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Aristotelian ethics, The Five Ways, Aquinas, Buridan, Bonaventure, Humor",
author = "Schuman, {Boaz Faraday}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.5406/21521026.39.2.02",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "113--129",
journal = "History of Philosophy Quarterly",
issn = "0740-0675",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scholastic Humor

T2 - Ready Wit as a Virtue in Theory and Practice

AU - Schuman, Boaz Faraday

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Scholastic philosophers can be quite funny. What’s more, they have good reason to be: Aristotle himself lists ready wit (eutrapelia) among the virtues, as a mean between excessive humor and its defect. Here, I assess Scholastic discussions of humor in theory, before turning to examples of it in practice. The last and finest of these is a joke, hitherto unacknowledged, which Aquinas makes in his famous Five Ways. Along the way, we’ll see (i) that the history of philosophy is not so hostile to humor as is commonly supposed; and (ii) that the competing theories of humor like the Incongruity Theory and the Release Theory are not altogether incompatible. We’ll also see (iii) at least one example of an apparent attempt by modern translators to excise humor from a medieval text. These considerations open a window into what oral discussion and debate at medieval universities was actually like, and how we should understand the relationship between the texts we have now and the exchanges that actually occurred then.

AB - Scholastic philosophers can be quite funny. What’s more, they have good reason to be: Aristotle himself lists ready wit (eutrapelia) among the virtues, as a mean between excessive humor and its defect. Here, I assess Scholastic discussions of humor in theory, before turning to examples of it in practice. The last and finest of these is a joke, hitherto unacknowledged, which Aquinas makes in his famous Five Ways. Along the way, we’ll see (i) that the history of philosophy is not so hostile to humor as is commonly supposed; and (ii) that the competing theories of humor like the Incongruity Theory and the Release Theory are not altogether incompatible. We’ll also see (iii) at least one example of an apparent attempt by modern translators to excise humor from a medieval text. These considerations open a window into what oral discussion and debate at medieval universities was actually like, and how we should understand the relationship between the texts we have now and the exchanges that actually occurred then.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Aristotelian ethics

KW - The Five Ways

KW - Aquinas

KW - Buridan

KW - Bonaventure

KW - Humor

UR - https://philpapers.org/rec/SCHSHR-3

U2 - 10.5406/21521026.39.2.02

DO - 10.5406/21521026.39.2.02

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 113

EP - 129

JO - History of Philosophy Quarterly

JF - History of Philosophy Quarterly

SN - 0740-0675

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 305800783