The right to be forgotten

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The right to be forgotten. / Jones, Meg Leta; Zeide, Elana; Mai, Jens Erik; Jones, Elisabeth; Dupre, Jill; Richards, Neil.

I: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Bind 52, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 1-3.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jones, ML, Zeide, E, Mai, JE, Jones, E, Dupre, J & Richards, N 2015, 'The right to be forgotten', Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, bind 52, nr. 1, s. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010

APA

Jones, M. L., Zeide, E., Mai, J. E., Jones, E., Dupre, J., & Richards, N. (2015). The right to be forgotten. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010

Vancouver

Jones ML, Zeide E, Mai JE, Jones E, Dupre J, Richards N. The right to be forgotten. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;52(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010

Author

Jones, Meg Leta ; Zeide, Elana ; Mai, Jens Erik ; Jones, Elisabeth ; Dupre, Jill ; Richards, Neil. / The right to be forgotten. I: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015 ; Bind 52, Nr. 1. s. 1-3.

Bibtex

@article{038158eca7004fe4a7e3660d243d36ac,
title = "The right to be forgotten",
abstract = "The right to be forgotten gained international attention in May 2014, when the European Court of Justice ruled that Google was obligated to recognize European citizens{\textquoteright} data protection rights to address inadequate, irrelevant, or excessive personal information. As of April 14, 2015, Google received 239,337 requests to eliminate 867,930 URLs from search results and has removed 305,095 URLs, a rate of 41.5 percent. The right to be forgotten is intended to legally address digital information that lingers and threatens to shackle individuals to their past by exposing the information to opaque data processing and online judgment. There are a number of challenges to developing these rights – digital information means and touches so many aspects of life across cultures as they grapple with new policies. The controversial ruling and establishment of such a right, potential for a similar movement in the U.S., and future of transborder data flows will be discussed by this esteemed panel.",
keywords = "digital privacy, Information ethics & information policy, information retrieval & search engines, international policy",
author = "Jones, {Meg Leta} and Elana Zeide and Mai, {Jens Erik} and Elisabeth Jones and Jill Dupre and Neil Richards",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology",
issn = "2373-9231",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The right to be forgotten

AU - Jones, Meg Leta

AU - Zeide, Elana

AU - Mai, Jens Erik

AU - Jones, Elisabeth

AU - Dupre, Jill

AU - Richards, Neil

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The right to be forgotten gained international attention in May 2014, when the European Court of Justice ruled that Google was obligated to recognize European citizens’ data protection rights to address inadequate, irrelevant, or excessive personal information. As of April 14, 2015, Google received 239,337 requests to eliminate 867,930 URLs from search results and has removed 305,095 URLs, a rate of 41.5 percent. The right to be forgotten is intended to legally address digital information that lingers and threatens to shackle individuals to their past by exposing the information to opaque data processing and online judgment. There are a number of challenges to developing these rights – digital information means and touches so many aspects of life across cultures as they grapple with new policies. The controversial ruling and establishment of such a right, potential for a similar movement in the U.S., and future of transborder data flows will be discussed by this esteemed panel.

AB - The right to be forgotten gained international attention in May 2014, when the European Court of Justice ruled that Google was obligated to recognize European citizens’ data protection rights to address inadequate, irrelevant, or excessive personal information. As of April 14, 2015, Google received 239,337 requests to eliminate 867,930 URLs from search results and has removed 305,095 URLs, a rate of 41.5 percent. The right to be forgotten is intended to legally address digital information that lingers and threatens to shackle individuals to their past by exposing the information to opaque data processing and online judgment. There are a number of challenges to developing these rights – digital information means and touches so many aspects of life across cultures as they grapple with new policies. The controversial ruling and establishment of such a right, potential for a similar movement in the U.S., and future of transborder data flows will be discussed by this esteemed panel.

KW - digital privacy

KW - Information ethics & information policy

KW - information retrieval & search engines

KW - international policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987729491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010

DO - 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010010

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84987729491

VL - 52

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology

JF - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology

SN - 2373-9231

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 170188660