Standard
Virtue reversed : Principal argumentative vices in political debate. / Kock, Christian Erik J.
Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013. red. / Dima Mohammed; Marcin Lewiński. Windsor : University of Windsor, 2014.
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
Kock, CEJ 2014,
Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate. i D Mohammed & M Lewiński (red),
Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013. University of Windsor, Windsor. <
http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/93/>
APA
Kock, C. E. J. (2014).
Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate. I D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (red.),
Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013 University of Windsor.
http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/93/
Vancouver
Kock CEJ. Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate. I Mohammed D, Lewiński M, red., Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013. Windsor: University of Windsor. 2014
Author
Kock, Christian Erik J. / Virtue reversed : Principal argumentative vices in political debate. Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 2013. red. / Dima Mohammed ; Marcin Lewiński. Windsor : University of Windsor, 2014.
Bibtex
@inproceedings{1b1852e2f1e34ecf8149a0dd31c587fc,
title = "Virtue reversed: Principal argumentative vices in political debate",
abstract = "Contributing to an understanding of the true virtues of argumentation, this papersketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or {\textquoteleft}malpractices{\textquoteright} that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.",
author = "Kock, {Christian Erik J}",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
day = "15",
language = "English",
editor = "Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewi{\'n}ski",
booktitle = "Virtues of Argumentation",
publisher = "University of Windsor",
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Virtue reversed
T2 - Principal argumentative vices in political debate
AU - Kock, Christian Erik J
PY - 2014/6/15
Y1 - 2014/6/15
N2 - Contributing to an understanding of the true virtues of argumentation, this papersketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or ‘malpractices’ that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.
AB - Contributing to an understanding of the true virtues of argumentation, this papersketches and exemplifies a theoretically reasoned but simple typology of argumentative vices or ‘malpractices’ that are rampant in political debate in modern democracies. The typology reflects, in negative, a set of argumentative norms, thus making a bid for something that civic instruction might profitably teach students at all levels about deliberative democracy.
M3 - Article in proceedings
BT - Virtues of Argumentation
A2 - Mohammed, Dima
A2 - Lewiński, Marcin
PB - University of Windsor
CY - Windsor
ER -
