Abstract:
Purpose – A big issue in the literature about research libraries is their potential role managing research data. The present article studies the arguments for and against this task for libraries and information professionals and presents the many competitors to libraries in this field. It will not, however, analyse or evaluate specific tools or services of data management.
Design/methodology/approach – The article considers the nature of data and discusses data typologies, kinds of data in databases and considers the implications of the criticism raised against the data-information-knowledge (DIK) hierarchy. It outlines the many competing agencies in data curating and describes their relations to different kinds of data.
Findings – Many data are organically connected to the activities of large domain-specific organizations for which reason it seems difficult for research libraries to take over the tasks involved in the curating of their data. It seems more likely that the qualifications of information professionals become needed in such organizations and that the functions of research libraries may migrate to the producers of research data. In some cases, however, research libraries may be the best place to select, keep, organize and facilitate the use of research data. In order to be prepared for this task, research libraries should be actively involved in domain-analytic studies of their respective domains.
Originality/value –The paper offers a theoretical analysis and clarification of the problems of data curating from the perspective of research libraries.