Theoretical clarity is not “Manicheanism”: A reply to Marcia Bates

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Dokumenter

It is argued that in order to establish a new theoretical approach to information science it is necessary to express disagreement with some established views. The “social turn” in information science is not just exemplified in relation to the works of Marcia Bates but in relation to many different researchers in the field. Therefore it should not be taken personally, and the debate should focus on the substance. Marcia Bates has contributed considerably to information science. In spite of this some of her theoretical points of departure may be challenged. It is important to seek theoretical clarity and this may involve a degree of schematic confrontation that should not be confused with theoretical one-sidedness, “Manicheanism” or lack of respect.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Information Science
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)546-552
Antal sider7
ISSN0165-5515
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Bibliografisk note

Answer to M. J. Bates (2011). Birger Hjørland’s Manichean Misconstruction of Marcia Bates’ Work, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10):2038–2044. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21594.

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 47065832